spacer    
Blog Search
Others' posts of interest
Recent del.icio.us tags
Consumer evaluation of mental health and substance abuse providers - sharing experiences on the web
Jun 22

Written by: Matthew Hile
6/22/2007 5:11 AM

We have all come to rely on sending and receiving information via email. However, working with protected health information it is important to realize that it is neither appropriate, nor HIPPA compliant, to send that data without protecting it so that only the intended recipient can access its content.

The State of Missouri - Department of Mental Health has implemented a new secure email messaging system to comply with their operation regulations (DOR 8.340). Since the various state departments share a consolidated email system through the Office of Administration I assume that other departments also use this approach. Today I got my first secure message and thought it would be worth describing the experience.

Initial registration

The first thing that happens is that you get an official looking email message with a note directing you to click the attachment (an html link) to view your message. This gave me pause. For security reasons you should never click on an attachment that you were not expecting. Rather than calling the sender I opened the header information (in Outlook’s Option section) to assure myself that it was from the department. (It would have been better to call the sender but I did not expect him to be in the office at 5am). This link lead me to a secure web page where my browser warned me that it could not verify the security certificate that was being used. I checked out the certificate and could not tell why it would not verify but it looked OK and, liking to live dangerously, I decided to accept it for a single use. This opened the web page in my browser and informed me that I would now be able to receive secure messages.

The technology for this solution is provided by Proofpoint and uses a PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) identity-based encryption. The major advantage of this is that a user does not need to download/install any software nor do they need to have any skills other than clicking on various links and buttons.

Receiving secure messages

Once you have been verified it is easy to read and respond to any secure messages that you receive. A message will arrive telling you to open the attachment. In Outlook you will be warned that it is a potentially unsafe attachment and told to open it only if it is from a trustworthy source. Saying OK at that point will start your browser and open a secure web page (this time the browser was able to verify the certificate) with a button to click to read the message.

The email message interface is simple and quite easy to use giving you options to reply and forward the message in a secure manner. Files can also be attached and they will also be secured for transmission.

Usability

Positives: From an end user perspective this is the easiest PKI implementation I have ever seen. There is no software to load, no user registration, no passwords to remember, really nothing required from the user other than a few links to click. Given the usual complexities of PKI this is a great leap forward. Secure email can be sent to people on different email systems who can reply and forward securely as well.

Negatives: 1) Users’ email systems must accept attachments to get to the secure site. There are some corporate environments that strip out attachments to increase their level of security. 2) Because it takes at least three clicks to read an email there is an added level of frustration/irritation. 3) The user has to use a different interface to enter email and does not have the features that they take for granted (e.g., checking email addresses, spell checking). 4) Unless they go through the multi-step process of copying and saving the content in some other form, email messages are not searchable or quickly available. Say I get a series of secure messages with the same title (e.g., “RE: [encrypt] This is how to encrypt email”). To find a particular message in that set I need to click on each message three times to read it. That would get old fast. 5) While it is easy to reply and forward a secure message it is difficult for a user from outside of the system to initially create a secure message to send to the Department. As far as I can tell to do this you would open a previously received secure message, click reply, delete the current information (e.g., to, subject, message) then send.

Final thoughts

There are a lot of usability issues with this system. However, its ability to use PKI to send secure emails without the traditional difficulties associated with that infrastructure make it a useful approach to solving the problem of securing protected health data as it is sent over the internet.

Tags:

Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment    Cancel  
Disclaimer
NOTE: The ideas, opinions, and viewpoints expressed in these entries are solely those of the author.
There are no categories in this blog.
 
Missouri Institute of Mental Health    Terms Of Use    Privacy Statement